Accessibility Audit
Automated testing against WCAG 2.1 and 2.2 success criteria, so you know where your site creates barriers for people using assistive technology before a customer, an auditor, or a lawsuit finds out first.
Anonymous • WCAG 2.1 / 2.2 AA • No data stored
What it covers
- WCAG 2.1/2.2 A/AA/AAA coverage
- Missing alt text, low contrast, unlabeled form fields, broken heading structure
- Findings ranked Critical / Serious / Moderate / Minor by real-world impact
- Branded PDF export for your dev team or client
Frequently asked
Your page is tested against WCAG 2.1 and 2.2 success criteria (A/AA/AAA best-practice tags) using axe-core — the same engine behind most commercial accessibility scanners. It flags issues like missing alt text, poor color contrast, missing form labels, and improper heading structure.
Automated tools catch roughly 57% of WCAG issues. The remainder — keyboard traps, screen reader announcements, cognitive load, focus order — require manual testing by a human expert. Treat this report as a strong first pass, not a compliance certificate.
Severity reflects impact on people using assistive technology. Critical issues (e.g. missing form labels) can block a task entirely. Serious issues cause major friction. Moderate and Minor issues are usability or best-practice gaps that are still worth fixing.
It maps to WCAG 2.1/2.2, which underlies ADA (US), EN 301 549 (EU), and most accessibility legislation worldwide. Passing this scan reduces legal risk but does not by itself guarantee compliance — manual audits and user testing with assistive tech are still recommended for legal sign-off.
Yes — accessibility reports include a PDF export with full violation details, element selectors, and remediation guidance, branded and ready to share with your dev team or client.
Typically 5–15 seconds depending on page complexity. You see a live progress stream as each WCAG rule runs — no blank spinner.